Daniel Craig to open the Olympics, as James Bond →

April 3rd, 2012

At first it sounds cheesy, but the intro is being filmed in Buckingham Palace, and 2012 isn’t only the year of the Olympics; it’s the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee and the 50th anniversary of the Bond films.

 It’s a huge coup for BBC producers and Danny [Bowle] to be allowed into the palace and have the Queen involved.

That wording sounds like The Queen will actually be in it. Although that’s kinda hard to believe, and the quote is from an anonymous source for The Sun.

This is what the sequels to The Matrix should have been based on →

March 31st, 2012

Buying an Apple product? →

March 30th, 2012

Apple are begrudgingly honouring EU laws that the minimum warranty allowed for electronics is 2 years (based on the idea that computing devices should last at least that long without breaking).

Apple’s standard warranty is 1 year. If you’re buying a shiny new Apple device, buy it direct from Apple to get the mandatory 2 year warranty from them, rather than getting pointed at whoever you bought it from, if it breaks.

switch →

March 30th, 2012

I’ve noticed a few reports recently, where a previously paid-for app or game becomes free, with in-app purchases to get back old functionality. People that previously paid, are now in a position where they have to pay again, to get the same function. If this happens to you, definitely try contacting Apple for a refund (instructions).

Officially, Apple don’t do refunds for anything purchased from iTunes or the App store, but I’ve had a couple of naff apps refunded in the past.

Looks like a 7.85″ iPad is more plausible than previously thought →

March 28th, 2012

One reason often given that Apple wouldn’t make a smaller (cheaper) iPad, is that apps would have to be re-designed to fit a third screen size. The iPhone has always been 3.5″ and the iPad has always been 9.7″, giving developers 2 screen sizes to support, if they want to have their app on all iOS devices. Adding a third size to the mix would have to gain consumers and Apple a lot, to be worth the increased fragmentation in the App store. The problem is that, as buttons shrink, they get difficult to press, given our fat fingers. (This isn’t a big deal on computers, because the point on a mouse is always 1 pixel.)

However, it looks like Apple have built in a redundancy that would allow existing iPad apps to shrink to 7.85″ and still be usable.

The original iPhone screen was 163 PPI, and Apple’s design guidelines state 44px by 44px is the smallest comfortable size for a button (or any tappable area) at that pixel density. The design guidelines for the iPad uses the same minimum pixel-size, despite it’s screen having a lower density. The result is that the smallest allowed button on an iPad is physically bigger than on an iPhone. Shrinking the iPad to 7.85″ and giving it the original iPad’s resolution (1024 x 768) gets to the 163 PPI of the original iPhone. It would run iPad apps simply shruken to fit the screen, and despite everything being smaller, buttons are still big enough to comfortably use.

Great idea for a project →

March 21st, 2012

A model bus telling when the next buses are due. Read the rest of this entry »

The Machete order →

March 19th, 2012

This is a long, reasoned article proposing an order to watch the Star Wars movies, different to canonical order, or release order. It makes a surprising amount of sense. I just wish we could erase memories so I could try it out fresh!

Hat tip to William (my brother).

Didn’t expect to read this →

March 16th, 2012

 That’s why Microsoft is so much more interesting today: while Google seems to think they don’t need to change anything and Apple’s customers are brainwashed by marketing, Ballmer has shut up about Apple publicly and Microsoft is making radical changes.

BYP website wins an award from the IAC →

March 15th, 2012

I’m the webmaster of the Backyard Productions website, and we just won an award for best IAC club website.

One week to win a new right to parody →

March 15th, 2012

The UK government is considering amendments to copyright law, and the right to parody is one of the amendments being considered. This is an exception the US already have in their laws, and allows the use of copyrighted material for parody (e.g. Spoof songs, campaigns, commentary).

The government last considered this in 2006, but lobbying by incumbent industries prevented a change. Read the Open Rights Group’s article for more info, if you’d like to add your voice to the debate in parliament.

We have one more week to tell policy makers that we need a right to parody. You can help by *writing to the consultationcopyrightconsultation@ipo.gov.uk *to tell them why you think this is a good idea.