Who cares about 3D maps? →

September 26th, 2012

If this story is true, Google are putting off bringing a native Google Maps app to the iPhone, until they’ve integrated the Google Earth 3D stuff in it, to match Apple’s 3D maps.

I just don’t get why the 3D stuff is useful on a map? Google Earth is great, and it’s fun to explore cities by flying around, but turn-by-turn and navigation features (like public transport schedules) are the killer features for maps. Google Maps already has street-view. Use that as the differentiator from Apple.

It’s all just rumours, anyway. But I thought I’d share my thoughts.

Meeting a Troll →

September 25th, 2012

This is an amazing story. It’s terrifying, but the compassion is amazing. What an ordeal to go through!

Pixar story rules →

September 23rd, 2012

Interesting list.

The Economics of Stolen Bicycles →

September 22nd, 2012

Insights like this are really interesting. Although don’t make you feel happier about your favourite bike that got stolen.

01 Sep 12

September 19th, 2012

15 Sep 12

September 19th, 2012

Background to Apple designing their own CPUs →

September 19th, 2012

Most of the smartphone boom has been powered by ARM’s processor architectures (whoo! UK based company!).

Apple have been acquiring processor architecture talent and deals with ARM, which is just starting to really pay off with the iPhone 5. This is one of the edges Apple has over other smartphone makers.

And I think processor architecture is super interesting. When you look at a computer, it starts off pretty simple. (e.g. hit keys and letters appear on the screen) As you look at it deeper, it gets more and more complex, until you get to the processor. This is where the complexity starts to unravel, and you discover simple logic circuits doing simple things.

Charges for phone unlocking

September 18th, 2012

The practice of locking phones bought under a contract is pretty rubbish. However, my experience has been that towards the end of your contract, when you’ve finished paying off the phone subsidy, carriers unlock your phone, that you now fully own.

However, Three UK are refusing to unlock my iPhone, which has just reached the end of its contract, without me paying a £15.32 administration fee. An admin fee they want me to pay, for them to undo the shitty thing they did to my phone.

I’ve tried escalating the issue, but even the complaints department won’t budge on this policy. I’m not sure what I can do next. I’m tied to Three unless I pay the fee.

I’ve sent the following email to David Dyson, Three CEO (I had to guess his email address), but don’t expect that to reach him. Worth a punt.

Hi David

I’ve been a happy Three customer over the last two years. Now that my current contract has expired, I’m planning to buy a new phone, and start a new contract, hopefully with Three again.

However, I’m preparing my old phone, which is now completely out of contract, and therefore fully paid for, but your customer services and complaints team refuse to get me the unlocking code without charging an admin fee of £15.32.

This fee is completely unfair. I’ve paid for the phone outright now that the contract has expired.Please can you have a look at your policies around handset unlocking charges. I understand that phone locking is considered necessary when the handset price is subsidised by the contract, but once the contract has been paid for I should be released from any obligation, and given the freedom to use the handset as I like, including on any network.

I have a case number for my complaint: [redacted] My current handset is an iPhone 4, bought from 3 with a contract 2 years ago.

All the best

Matthew

Update: Three’s executive office called me, but they won’t budge on the unlocking admin fee. They insist charges to unlock are standard practice, but it hasn’t been my experience:

  • O2 UK – no charge, even during the contract
  • Vodafone UK – no charge for contract phones
  • Three Ireland – No charge once you’ve completed the contract

Daft Punk are so cool →

September 11th, 2012

This is an article about them from 1997, about their origins.

Daft Punk have a reputation for being difficult that would shame Dave Clarke. They won’t have their photograph taken unless their faces are obscured. They ooze a bored hauteur onstage, barely moving, never smiling. They stormed out of a press conference at the prestigious Transmusicalles festival when someone asked them a “stupid” question. They sat in attitude-laden silence on the Heavenly Social tour bus, while the Chemicals and co got wasted and auctioned off pills. Another magazine described them as “surly”. Their press officer tells me their last interviewer gave up and went home after 20 minutes of blank stares and monosyllabic answers.

Eventually, they settle on clown masks with protuberant red noses. They look at each other… and burst out laughing.

Should AI get rights?

September 8th, 2012

I’ve sometimes wondered about the likes of The Animatrix and Battlestar Galactica, whether if we do produce AI that wants to be alive or have other rights, will we be mature enough to give them those rights. I really hope we will be, but people are pretty slow to adapt to change. But! We’ve had lots of sci-fi stories to help us ponder and prepare for that day. Maybe we’ll have prepared ourselves. (If you haven’t seen The Second Renaissance from The Animatrix, then definitely watch it.)

Sadly, from the looks of this article on TechDirt and its comments, from a generally intelligent community, it looks liked here’s no hope we’ll skip the atrocities the next time there’s an oppressed group in our society.