Joshua Micheal Russell

June 10th, 2014

Joshua Micheal Russell was born at 0710, 10th June 2014. He weighed a rather hefty 3.97kg (8lb 12). This time, the labour was over pretty quickly! Again, Caroline skipped all the build up, and was fully-dilated when we got to the hospital, and from there the delivery went fairly smoothly. It was tough on Caroline though, because she was low on iron, fluids and sleep before even starting the birth! So she spent one night in hospital recovering.

Thanks everyone for moral support, prayers and well-wishing.

Especially big thanks to Nan-Nan, for already being at our house to look after Oscar! He had lots of fun with walks and ice cream, waiting to meet his baby brother.

Almost 4kg

June 10th, 2014

Mini man is getting weighed. He’s almost 4kg, or 8lb 12 (it may look like he weighs a little more in the pic, but his wriggling is making the scales wobble)

Mini man

June 10th, 2014

Born at 0710. 8lb 12. Mummy is exhausted!

I can see the head!

June 10th, 2014

Still pushing, but I can see the head now. We’re heading into the endgame. Caroline is in position and they’ve taken half the bed away!

Pushing!

June 10th, 2014

Caroline’s really pushing now! Making good progress. He’s hairy!

Here we go!

June 10th, 2014

Contractions started at 4, and waters broke. We’re at the hospital, now and turns out… She’s fully dilated!

Started pushing, so they want to see the baby within an hour!

Exploring Scott’s Grotto

June 7th, 2014

Read the rest of this entry »

Upgrading firmware on Samsung Spinpoint drives – HD203WI and HD204UI

May 27th, 2014

I have 4 of these drives, and they mostly just didn’t work when I installed them in a new computer. Turns out the firmware they shipped with is broken (on some AMD chips, and Intel Haswell chipsets), but there’s an upgrade available from Seagate (who own Samsung’s HDD division).

However I had a fair bit of fun getting the firmware installed, so here’s how I managed to do it. Hopefully this’ll help someone! Read the rest of this entry »

ZFS in Windows

May 24th, 2014

I’m experimenting with getting a ZFS array up in Windows, as a working drive.

ZFS, like RAID, can load-balance across hard drives, giving a significant performance improvement. You can also add some SSDs to your array, as cache drives. Plus ZFS has some great snapshotting features, and does an amazing job of keeping your data safe.

However. ZFS is not available on Windows.

I’ve set up a ZFS array in a Linux box that can achieve almost 300MB/s transfers, but when you’re going over a gigabit you’re limited to about 110MB/s. And with SSDs, that array could get much faster.

The next step I’m trying, is to put the ZFS array in a Linux VM, on the Windows workstation. So far this is going well – My VM has raw access to the disks, and with 2 SSDs in an array, it can write at 630MB/s and read at >1GB/s!

But. Windows accessing the files over samba is getting up to 350MB/s write-speeds (and not consistently). Most worrying is the best read speed I’ve seen is 160MB/s.

That’s much better than over a gigabit network, but not good enough to justify the agro of running the linux VM.

I’ve tried googling around, but struggling to find much relevant information. I’ve tweaked the samba settings, and some helped the write-speed, but none made much of a dent in the read-speed.

Next step is to try VirtualBox… maybe it’s networking handling will be better.

UPDATE: performance in VirtualBox was similar. I find the slower read speed must confusing. I also tried using iSCSI instead of Samba, but got similar performance.

I’ve given up for the time being… Maybe the way forward is an external box hosting the ZFS array with thunderbolt between them? Except Thunderbolt cards aren’t much cheaper than 10gb network cards 🙁

Who to vote for?

May 22nd, 2014

For me, the most important political policies relate to personal freedom and privacy, particularly following the Snowden revelations.

I don’t have the opportunity to vote for The Pirate Party (they’re only represented in the North West Region), so I’m trying to figure out who else has good policies.

The Green Party’s manifesto has a good section about protecting our privacy, pushing for a digital Bill of Rights, and even promoting open-source software!

Lib Dem’s is all about protecting children – which is code for restricting freedom. They don’t even mention privacy concerns or net-neutrality. Hardly liberal.

Labour and Conservatives make no mention of policies about the Internet.